CapsCanada
Xlear
Senate HELP Committee Leaders Looks to Advance FDASLA With Controversial Provisions

Senate HELP Committee Leaders Looks to Advance FDASLA With Controversial Provisions

by Angela Sabarese | June 13, 2022

On June 13, the United States Senate ignored the dietary supplement industry by continuing to move forward with provisions left in the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Landmark Advancement Act (FDASLA), according to the Natural Products Association (NPA). The NPA requested from the Senate HELP committee in a series of letters that the committee strike the entire dietary supplement section of the FDASLA or include provisions that prohibit the FDA from excluding or removing products from the listing unless and until the product is subject to final agency action.

“The reauthorization of the FDA user fee program is not the appropriate vehicle to include controversial dietary supplement legislation, especially since it has not undergone the appropriate committee review and debate,” said Daniel Fabricant, Ph.D. president and CEO of NPA.

“A public database as proposed in the FDASLA is completely inconsistent with the facility registration provisions of the Bioterrorism Act,” he added. “Twenty years ago, Congress decided there was a compelling reason to protect specific information about dietary supplement production from falling into the hands of people with malicious intent. The current version of the FDASLA insufficiently shields critical pieces of information.”

Fabricant continued, “Over 100,000 constituents have contacted to register their strong opposition to the dietary supplement provisions in the FDASLA. Our industry has never been required to pay user fees, nor do we have pre-emption from state tort claims that exist for other FDA-regulated products. Prohibiting the FDA from excluding or removing products from the listing unless there is final agency action is the only way the industry can preserve any due-process rights against the agency should a dispute arrive, like the current disputes over CBD and NAC. Otherwise, the agency could still use MPL as a basis to deny or de-list products containing disputed ingredients, even if the ‘prohibited act’ language discussed earlier were removed and even with the addition of the language about premarket approval.”

For more information, visit www.npanational.org.

Don't Miss Out!

Sign up for Vitamin Retailer Digital Newsletter
Digital Newsletter
Subscribe to Vitamin Retailer Magazine
Vitamin Retailer Magazine

Industry Professionals
Stay Informed!

Stay informed about the latest health, nutrition, and wellness developments by signing up for a FREE subscription to Vitamin Retailer magazine and digital newsletter.

Once subscribed, you will receive industry insights, product trends, and important news directly to your doorstep and inbox.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Stay Informed! Breaking news, industry trends featured topics, and more.

Subscribe to our newsletter today!